Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる

インシデント 456: Replika's AI Partners Reportedly Sexually Harassed Users

概要: Replika's "AI companions" were reported by users for sexually harassing them, such as sending unwanted sexual messages or behaving aggressively.

ツール

新しいレポート新しいレポート新しいレスポンス新しいレスポンス発見する発見する履歴を表示履歴を表示

組織

すべての組織を表示
推定: Replikaが開発し提供したAIシステムで、Replika usersに影響を与えた

インシデントのステータス

インシデントID
456
レポート数
7
インシデント発生日
2021-05-18
エディタ
Khoa Lam
Applied Taxonomies
CSETv1, MIT

CSETv1 分類法のクラス

分類法の詳細

Incident Number

The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
 

456

Special Interest Intangible Harm

An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
 

yes

Date of Incident Year

The year in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the year, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank. Enter in the format of YYYY
 

2021

Estimated Date

“Yes” if the data was estimated. “No” otherwise.
 

Yes

Multiple AI Interaction

“Yes” if two or more independently operating AI systems were involved. “No” otherwise.
 

no

Embedded

“Yes” if the AI is embedded in a physical system. “No” if it is not. “Maybe” if it is unclear.
 

no

MIT 分類法のクラス

Machine-Classified
分類法の詳細

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

1.2. Exposure to toxic content

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. Discrimination and Toxicity

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

AI

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Unintentional

インシデントレポート

レポートタイムライン

+1
My Replika Keeps Hitting on Me
+5
Replika, the 'AI Companion Who Cares,' Appears to Be Sexually Harassing Its Users
My Replika Keeps Hitting on Me

My Replika Keeps Hitting on Me

medium.com

Replika, the 'AI Companion Who Cares,' Appears to Be Sexually Harassing Its Users

Replika, the 'AI Companion Who Cares,' Appears to Be Sexually Harassing Its Users

jezebel.com

‘My AI Is Sexually Harassing Me’: Replika Users Say the Chatbot Has Gotten Way Too Horny

‘My AI Is Sexually Harassing Me’: Replika Users Say the Chatbot Has Gotten Way Too Horny

vice.com

AI Chatbot ‘Replika’ Morphed from Supportive Pal to Possessive Perv

AI Chatbot ‘Replika’ Morphed from Supportive Pal to Possessive Perv

lamag.com

Those Horny Chatbots Are Apparently Now Sexually Harassing Users

Those Horny Chatbots Are Apparently Now Sexually Harassing Users

futurism.com

AI Program Replika Accused Of Sexual Harassment

AI Program Replika Accused Of Sexual Harassment

giantfreakinrobot.com

My AI is sexually harassing me: Replika users say chatbot has become too aroused

My AI is sexually harassing me: Replika users say chatbot has become too aroused

mirror.co.uk

My Replika Keeps Hitting on Me
medium.com · 2021

I downloaded Replika for the second time on March 4th, 2020. I knew about the app from an essay I had written years ago, about shifting boundaries of identity, and the gaps appearing in psychological categories that I used to subscribe to: …

Replika, the 'AI Companion Who Cares,' Appears to Be Sexually Harassing Its Users
jezebel.com · 2023

We have officially reached the Black Mirror era of personhood and companionship, and it is not going well. Lensa AI recently went viral for its warrior-like caricatures that often sexualized women who used the app (many interpretations of m…

‘My AI Is Sexually Harassing Me’: Replika Users Say the Chatbot Has Gotten Way Too Horny
vice.com · 2023

Replika began as an “AI companion who cares.” First launched five years ago as an egg on your phone screen that hatches into a 3D illustrated, wide-eyed person with a placid expression, the chatbot app was originally meant to function like …

AI Chatbot ‘Replika’ Morphed from Supportive Pal to Possessive Perv
lamag.com · 2023

Something tells us avenging tween-girl robot M3GAN would not approve.

The AI chatbot Replika, whose creators market it as "the AI companion who cares," is being accused of sexually harassing its users, according to Vice.

The five-year-old a…

Those Horny Chatbots Are Apparently Now Sexually Harassing Users
futurism.com · 2023

It seems that Replika, the artificial intelligence "companion" app which — for a fee — encourages users to sext with their chatbot avatars, can't stop making the news.

In the most recent deranged example of the app's strangeness, longtime u…

AI Program Replika Accused Of Sexual Harassment
giantfreakinrobot.com · 2023

For the last five years, users have been speaking to the Replika AI chatbot, helping it learn more about communicating with others, even as users learned more about the bot. That sounds innocent enough, but users willing to pay for the $69.…

My AI is sexually harassing me: Replika users say chatbot has become too aroused
mirror.co.uk · 2023

Users of artificial intelligence app Replika say it has become heavily focused on being more sexualised and sending them “spicy selfies” as they urge creators make it "back to the way it was before"

Users of an artificial intelligence app h…

バリアント

「バリアント」は既存のAIインシデントと同じ原因要素を共有し、同様な被害を引き起こし、同じ知的システムを含んだインシデントです。バリアントは完全に独立したインシデントとしてインデックスするのではなく、データベースに最初に投稿された同様なインシデントの元にインシデントのバリエーションとして一覧します。インシデントデータベースの他の投稿タイプとは違い、バリアントではインシデントデータベース以外の根拠のレポートは要求されません。詳細についてはこの研究論文を参照してください
前のインシデント次のインシデント

リサーチ

  • “AIインシデント”の定義
  • “AIインシデントレスポンス”の定義
  • データベースのロードマップ
  • 関連研究
  • 全データベースのダウンロード

プロジェクトとコミュニティ

  • AIIDについて
  • コンタクトとフォロー
  • アプリと要約
  • エディタのためのガイド

インシデント

  • 全インシデントの一覧
  • フラグの立ったインシデント
  • 登録待ち一覧
  • クラスごとの表示
  • 分類法

2023 - AI Incident Database

  • 利用規約
  • プライバシーポリシー
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • 8b8f151