Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse

Incident 653: Two Investment Firms Charged with Making False Claims of Artificial Intelligence Capabilities in Case of AI Washing

Responded
Description: In a case of AI washing, the SEC charged two investment advisers, Delphia and Global Predictions, for falsely stating their use of artificial intelligence in their investment strategies between 2019 and 2023. Their misleading claims resulted in a settlement whereby the firms agreed to pay a total of $400,000 in penalties, highlighting the critical consequences of misrepresenting AI capabilities on investment decisions and trust.

Tools

New ReportNew ReportNew ResponseNew ResponseDiscoverDiscoverView HistoryView History

Entities

View all entities
Alleged: Global Predictions Inc. and Delphia (USA) Inc. developed and deployed an AI system, which harmed Investors.

Incident Stats

Incident ID
653
Report Count
1
Incident Date
2019-01-01
Editors
Applied Taxonomies
MIT

MIT Taxonomy Classifications

Machine-Classified
Taxonomy Details

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

3.1. False or misleading information

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. Misinformation

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

Human

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Intentional

Incident Reports

Reports Timeline

Incident OccurrenceSEC Charges Two Investment Advisers with Making False and Misleading Statements About Their Use of Artificial Intelligence - Response
SEC Charges Two Investment Advisers with Making False and Misleading Statements About Their Use of Artificial Intelligence

SEC Charges Two Investment Advisers with Making False and Misleading Statements About Their Use of Artificial Intelligence

sec.gov

SEC Charges Two Investment Advisers with Making False and Misleading Statements About Their Use of Artificial Intelligence
sec.gov · 2024
Securities and Exchange Commission post-incident response

Washington D.C., March 18, 2024 --- The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against two investment advisers, Delphia (USA) Inc. and Global Predictions Inc., for making false and misleading statements about the…

Variants

A "variant" is an incident that shares the same causative factors, produces similar harms, and involves the same intelligent systems as a known AI incident. Rather than index variants as entirely separate incidents, we list variations of incidents under the first similar incident submitted to the database. Unlike other submission types to the incident database, variants are not required to have reporting in evidence external to the Incident Database. Learn more from the research paper.

Similar Incidents

By textual similarity

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

2010 Market Flash Crash

2010 Market Flash Crash

May 2010 · 30 reports
Defamation via AutoComplete

Defamation via AutoComplete

Apr 2011 · 28 reports
COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

May 2016 · 22 reports
Previous IncidentNext Incident

Similar Incidents

By textual similarity

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

2010 Market Flash Crash

2010 Market Flash Crash

May 2010 · 30 reports
Defamation via AutoComplete

Defamation via AutoComplete

Apr 2011 · 28 reports
COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

May 2016 · 22 reports

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2023 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • 8b8f151