Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse

Incident 290: False Negatives for Water Quality-Associated Beach Closures

Description: Toronto’s use of AI predictive modeling (AIPM) which had replaced existing methodology as the only determiner of beach water quality raised concerns about its accuracy, after allegedly conflicting results were found by a local water advocacy group using traditional means.

Tools

New ReportNew ReportNew ResponseNew ResponseDiscoverDiscoverView HistoryView History

Entities

View all entities
Alleged: Toronto Public Health developed an AI system deployed by Toronto city government, which harmed Sunnyside beachgoers , Marie Curtis beachgoers and Toronto citizens.

Incident Stats

Incident ID
290
Report Count
3
Incident Date
2022-06-03
Editors
Khoa Lam
Applied Taxonomies
CSETv1, GMF, MIT

CSETv1 Taxonomy Classifications

Taxonomy Details

Incident Number

The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
 

290

MIT Taxonomy Classifications

Machine-Classified
Taxonomy Details

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

7.3. Lack of capability or robustness

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. AI system safety, failures, and limitations

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

AI

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Unintentional

Incident Reports

Reports Timeline

Incident OccurrenceSafe for swimming? Toronto’s new tool for measuring water quality at its beaches is misleading, say advocatesToronto Tapped Artificial Intelligence to Warn Swimmers. The Experiment FailedThe bait and switch behind AI risk prediction tools
Safe for swimming? Toronto’s new tool for measuring water quality at its beaches is misleading, say advocates

Safe for swimming? Toronto’s new tool for measuring water quality at its beaches is misleading, say advocates

thestar.com

Toronto Tapped Artificial Intelligence to Warn Swimmers. The Experiment Failed

Toronto Tapped Artificial Intelligence to Warn Swimmers. The Experiment Failed

theinformation.com

The bait and switch behind AI risk prediction tools

The bait and switch behind AI risk prediction tools

aisnakeoil.substack.com

Safe for swimming? Toronto’s new tool for measuring water quality at its beaches is misleading, say advocates
thestar.com · 2022

A safe water advocacy group is concerned for the health of Toronto beachgoers after the city’s new water quality monitoring system appears to have repeatedly allowed contaminated beaches to remain open.

This summer, the city quietly adopted…

Toronto Tapped Artificial Intelligence to Warn Swimmers. The Experiment Failed
theinformation.com · 2022

Earlier this year, Toronto's public health department quietly flipped the switch on an experiment targeting the city's most pollution-prone beaches.

Instead of relying on day-old laboratory tests to ensure that people don't swim in unsafe w…

The bait and switch behind AI risk prediction tools
aisnakeoil.substack.com · 2022

Toronto recently used an AI tool to predict when a public beach will be safe. It went horribly awry. 

The developer claimed the tool achieved over 90% accuracy in predicting when beaches would be safe to swim in. But the tool did much worse…

Variants

A "variant" is an incident that shares the same causative factors, produces similar harms, and involves the same intelligent systems as a known AI incident. Rather than index variants as entirely separate incidents, we list variations of incidents under the first similar incident submitted to the database. Unlike other submission types to the incident database, variants are not required to have reporting in evidence external to the Incident Database. Learn more from the research paper.
Previous IncidentNext Incident

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2023 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • 30ebe76