Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse

Incident 258: Australian Retailers Reportedly Captured Face Prints of Their Customers without Consent

Description: Major Australian retailers reportedly analyzed in-store footage to capture facial features of their customers without consent, which was criticized by consumer groups as creepy and invasive.

Tools

New ReportNew ReportNew ResponseNew ResponseDiscoverDiscoverView HistoryView History

Entities

View all entities
Alleged: unknown developed an AI system deployed by The Good Guys , Kmart and Bunnings, which harmed The Good Guys customers , Kmart customers and Bunnings customers.

Incident Stats

Incident ID
258
Report Count
2
Incident Date
2022-05-13
Editors
Khoa Lam
Applied Taxonomies
GMF, MIT

MIT Taxonomy Classifications

Machine-Classified
Taxonomy Details

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

2.1. Compromise of privacy by obtaining, leaking or correctly inferring sensitive information

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. Privacy & Security

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

Human

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Intentional

Incident Reports

Reports Timeline

Incident OccurrenceFacial recognition technology: Major retailers secretly creating “face prints” of their customers, says ChoiceKmart, Bunnings and The Good Guys using facial recognition technology in stores
Facial recognition technology: Major retailers secretly creating “face prints” of their customers, says Choice

Facial recognition technology: Major retailers secretly creating “face prints” of their customers, says Choice

smh.com.au

Kmart, Bunnings and The Good Guys using facial recognition technology in stores

Kmart, Bunnings and The Good Guys using facial recognition technology in stores

choice.com.au

Facial recognition technology: Major retailers secretly creating “face prints” of their customers, says Choice
smh.com.au · 2022

Major Australian retailers have been secretly capturing the faces of their customers without their knowledge, a consumer group investigation has found.

The Choice investigation examined 25 of the country’s biggest retailers and revealed Bun…

Kmart, Bunnings and The Good Guys using facial recognition technology in stores
choice.com.au · 2022

OAIC launches commission-initiated investigation into Kmart and Bunnings' use of facial recognition

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has opened investigations into the personal information handling practices of Bunnings…

Variants

A "variant" is an incident that shares the same causative factors, produces similar harms, and involves the same intelligent systems as a known AI incident. Rather than index variants as entirely separate incidents, we list variations of incidents under the first similar incident submitted to the database. Unlike other submission types to the incident database, variants are not required to have reporting in evidence external to the Incident Database. Learn more from the research paper.
Previous IncidentNext Incident

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2023 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • 5fc5e5b