Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse

Incident 135: UT Austin GRADE Algorithm Allegedly Reinforced Historical Inequalities

Description: The University of Texas at Austin's Department of Computer Science's assistive algorithm to assess PhD applicants "GRADE" raised concerns among faculty about worsening historical inequalities for marginalized candidates, prompting its suspension.

Tools

New ReportNew ReportNew ResponseNew ResponseDiscoverDiscoverView HistoryView History

Entities

View all entities
Alleged: University of Texas at Austin researchers developed an AI system deployed by University of Texas at Austin's Department of Computer Science, which harmed University of Texas at Austin PhD applicants of marginalized groups.

Incident Stats

Incident ID
135
Report Count
2
Incident Date
2012-12-01
Editors
Sean McGregor, Khoa Lam
Applied Taxonomies
CSETv1, GMF, MIT

CSETv1 Taxonomy Classifications

Taxonomy Details

Incident Number

The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
 

135

MIT Taxonomy Classifications

Machine-Classified
Taxonomy Details

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

1.1. Unfair discrimination and misrepresentation

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. Discrimination and Toxicity

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

Human

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Intentional

Incident Reports

Reports Timeline

Incident Occurrence+1
Uni revealed it killed off its PhD-applicant screening AI – just as its inventors gave a lecture about the tech
Uni revealed it killed off its PhD-applicant screening AI – just as its inventors gave a lecture about the tech

Uni revealed it killed off its PhD-applicant screening AI – just as its inventors gave a lecture about the tech

theregister.com

The Death and Life of an Admissions Algorithm

The Death and Life of an Admissions Algorithm

insidehighered.com

Uni revealed it killed off its PhD-applicant screening AI – just as its inventors gave a lecture about the tech
theregister.com · 2020

A university announced it had ditched its machine-learning tool, used to filter thousands of PhD applications, right as the software's creators were giving a talk about the code and drawing public criticism.

The GRADE algorithm was develope…

The Death and Life of an Admissions Algorithm
insidehighered.com · 2020

U of Texas at Austin has stopped using a machine-learning system to evaluate applicants for its Ph.D. in computer science. Critics say the system exacerbates existing inequality in the field.

In 2013, the University of Texas at Austin’s com…

Variants

A "variant" is an incident that shares the same causative factors, produces similar harms, and involves the same intelligent systems as a known AI incident. Rather than index variants as entirely separate incidents, we list variations of incidents under the first similar incident submitted to the database. Unlike other submission types to the incident database, variants are not required to have reporting in evidence external to the Incident Database. Learn more from the research paper.

Similar Incidents

By textual similarity

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Twitter’s Image Cropping Tool Allegedly Showed Gender and Racial Bias

Twitter’s Image Cropping Tool Allegedly Showed Gender and Racial Bias

Sep 2020 · 5 reports
TayBot

TayBot

Mar 2016 · 28 reports
Female Applicants Down-Ranked by Amazon Recruiting Tool

Female Applicants Down-Ranked by Amazon Recruiting Tool

Aug 2016 · 33 reports
Previous IncidentNext Incident

Similar Incidents

By textual similarity

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Twitter’s Image Cropping Tool Allegedly Showed Gender and Racial Bias

Twitter’s Image Cropping Tool Allegedly Showed Gender and Racial Bias

Sep 2020 · 5 reports
TayBot

TayBot

Mar 2016 · 28 reports
Female Applicants Down-Ranked by Amazon Recruiting Tool

Female Applicants Down-Ranked by Amazon Recruiting Tool

Aug 2016 · 33 reports

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2023 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • 30ebe76