Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse

Incident 101: Dutch Families Wrongfully Accused of Tax Fraud Due to Discriminatory Algorithm

Description: A childcare benefits system in the Netherlands falsely accused thousands of families of fraud, in part due to an algorithm that treated having a second nationality as a risk factor.

Tools

New ReportNew ReportNew ResponseNew ResponseDiscoverDiscoverView HistoryView History

Entities

View all entities
Alleged: unknown developed an AI system deployed by Dutch Tax Authority, which harmed Dutch Tax Authority and Dutch families.

Incident Stats

Incident ID
101
Report Count
6
Incident Date
2018-09-01
Editors
Sean McGregor, Khoa Lam
Applied Taxonomies
CSETv0, CSETv1, GMF, MIT

CSETv1 Taxonomy Classifications

Taxonomy Details

Incident Number

The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
 

101

AI Tangible Harm Level Notes

Notes about the AI tangible harm level assessment
 

financial harm and intangible harm. Fraud detection model described as a self-learning black box algorithm.

MIT Taxonomy Classifications

Machine-Classified
Taxonomy Details

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

1.1. Unfair discrimination and misrepresentation

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. Discrimination and Toxicity

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

Other

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Unintentional

Incident Reports

Reports Timeline

Incident Occurrence+1
How a Discriminatory Algorithm Wrongly Accused Thousands of Families of Fraud
Dutch scandal serves as a warning for Europe over risks of using algorithmsThe Dutch Tax Authority Was Felled by AI—What Comes Next?+1
This Algorithm Could Ruin Your Life
How a Discriminatory Algorithm Wrongly Accused Thousands of Families of Fraud

How a Discriminatory Algorithm Wrongly Accused Thousands of Families of Fraud

vice.com

The Dutch benefits scandal: a cautionary tale for algorithmic enforcement

The Dutch benefits scandal: a cautionary tale for algorithmic enforcement

eulawenforcement.com

Dutch scandal serves as a warning for Europe over risks of using algorithms

Dutch scandal serves as a warning for Europe over risks of using algorithms

politico.eu

The Dutch Tax Authority Was Felled by AI—What Comes Next?

The Dutch Tax Authority Was Felled by AI—What Comes Next?

spectrum-ieee-org.cdn.ampproject.org

This Algorithm Could Ruin Your Life

This Algorithm Could Ruin Your Life

wired.com

Inside the Suspicion Machine

Inside the Suspicion Machine

wired.com

How a Discriminatory Algorithm Wrongly Accused Thousands of Families of Fraud
vice.com · 2021

Last month, Prime Minister of the Netherlands Mark Rutte—along with his entire cabinet—resigned after a year and a half of investigations revealed that since 2013, 26,000 innocent families were wrongly accused of social benefits fraud parti…

The Dutch benefits scandal: a cautionary tale for algorithmic enforcement
eulawenforcement.com · 2021

On January 15, the Dutch government was forced to resign amidst a scandal around its child-care benefits scheme. Systems that were meant to detect misuse of the benefits scheme, mistakenly labelled over 20,000 parents as fraudsters. More cr…

Dutch scandal serves as a warning for Europe over risks of using algorithms
politico.eu · 2022

Chermaine Leysner’s life changed in 2012, when she received a letter from the Dutch tax authority demanding she pay back her child care allowance going back to 2008. Leysner, then a student studying social work, had three children under the…

The Dutch Tax Authority Was Felled by AI—What Comes Next?
spectrum-ieee-org.cdn.ampproject.org · 2022

Until recently, it wasn’t possible to say that AI had a hand in forcing a government to resign. But that’s precisely what happened in the Netherlands in January 2021, when the incumbent cabinet resigned over the so-called kinderopvangtoesla…

This Algorithm Could Ruin Your Life
wired.com · 2023

From the outside, Rotterdam’s welfare algorithm appears complex. The system, which was originally developed by consulting firm Accenture before the city took over development in 2018, is trained on data collected by Rotterdam’s welfare depa…

Inside the Suspicion Machine
wired.com · 2023

Every year, the city of Rotterdam in the Netherlands gives some 30,000 people welfare benefits to help them make rent, buy food, and pay essential bills. And every year, thousands of those people are investigated under suspicion of committi…

Variants

A "variant" is an incident that shares the same causative factors, produces similar harms, and involves the same intelligent systems as a known AI incident. Rather than index variants as entirely separate incidents, we list variations of incidents under the first similar incident submitted to the database. Unlike other submission types to the incident database, variants are not required to have reporting in evidence external to the Incident Database. Learn more from the research paper.

Similar Incidents

By textual similarity

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

May 2016 · 22 reports
Predictive Policing Biases of PredPol

Predictive Policing Biases of PredPol

Nov 2015 · 17 reports
Facebook’s Hate Speech Detection Algorithms Allegedly Disproportionately Failed to Remove Racist Content towards Minority Groups

Facebook’s Hate Speech Detection Algorithms Allegedly Disproportionately Failed to Remove Racist Content towards Minority Groups

Nov 2021 · 2 reports
Previous IncidentNext Incident

Similar Incidents

By textual similarity

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

May 2016 · 22 reports
Predictive Policing Biases of PredPol

Predictive Policing Biases of PredPol

Nov 2015 · 17 reports
Facebook’s Hate Speech Detection Algorithms Allegedly Disproportionately Failed to Remove Racist Content towards Minority Groups

Facebook’s Hate Speech Detection Algorithms Allegedly Disproportionately Failed to Remove Racist Content towards Minority Groups

Nov 2021 · 2 reports

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2023 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • 5fc5e5b